Feeding the world sustainably is one of the biggest challenges in the history of humankind. Today, two billion people in the world experience moderate or severe food insecurity (FAO, 2020). This lack of regular access to nutritious and sufficient food puts them at higher risk for malnutrition and poor health. Fish and fisheries products rank among some of the healthiest foods for human nutrition, as well as some of those that can be made available in ways that are less impactful to the environment. Aquatic living resources are paramount for national, regional and global food security. Without their contribution it will not be possible to achieve the targets set by United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), particularly those aiming to eliminate hunger and malnutrition. Fisheries and aquaculture are central for SDG 14 – Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development. Globally, fish and fisheries products provide nearly half of the world population with 20% of their intake of animal proteins, with this figure reaching 50% in some developing countries (FAO, 2020). While fish consumption varies across the globe, a growing trend is clearly evidenced, with low-income food-deficit countries having more than doubled their fish consumption over the last 50 years. A Blue Revolution is ongoing. All players have already acknowledged that fisheries and aquaculture will not be up to the challenge of feeding the world if “business as usual” continues. Good practices need to be replicated, fisheries and aquaculture need to re-adapt and obey by sustainability-driven policies framed within a global blue bioeconomy powered by nature-based solutions and blue biotechnology. Information on such good practices must be made easily available to the scientific community, as well as to policy makers and the common citizen. Evidence-based decision making has never been more relevant than today, as time is running short to afford the implementation of policy and management regulations that are not based on the best scientific information currently available. Interdisciplinary studies drawing knowledge from fisheries and aquaculture along with ecology, sociology, economics (etc.) need to be made available to the widest audience possible. Interdisciplinary studies of this nature may not reach their target audience as a publication outlet with this wide scope is still missing and these studies are often “lost in the publication wilderness”. A further limitation is the acceptance rate of scientific articles in the ISI category Fisheries, around 40%, with scientific publications justifying some rejection by a lack of novelty, a too regional focus or by not addressing “hot topics” that will increase the impact of such publications. Nonetheless, several of those rejected manuscripts feature important findings supported by sound scientific practices, which could advance the field in a meaningful way and support changing practices. To change the status quo, it is our pleasure to present the new peer-reviewed, open access publication entitled Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries. Our goal is to give researchers working on these topics (sensu lato) the opportunity to publish their findings, regardless of their novelty and potential impact on their research field. In this new publication, we aim to cover the multiple dimensions over which topics related with Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries span, acknowledging differences between freshwater and marine organisms, the different levels of intensification and technology associated with the practices targeting these living aquatic resources for food and non-food uses, as well as the existence of contrasting realities across different geographic regions and the added value of interdisciplinary approaches. At Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries we seek arguments to support publication, not rejection. The sole condition that must always be fulfilled to secure publication in Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries is the soundness of the scientific findings being reported. The editorial team strive to actively promote an author-friendly environment, having as its main motivation the acceptance of submissions through a constructive, transparent peer review process, intended to provide an educational reference point for both authors and reviewers, mentoring a new generation of scientists. We cover underrepresented areas of knowledge and regions of the globe where population growth will challenge food systems the most and, consequently, need to foster sustainable fisheries and aquaculture practices. Publications authored by female researchers on fisheries and aquaculture are still in the minority. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic enhanced this gender inequality (Viglione, 2020), and proactive actions are necessary to help correct the observed gender imbalance in submissions. We also actively support Early Career researchers by providing opportunities to work closely with our Editorial team to publish their scientific findings and engage them on the practices of open science, including a transparent and constructive peer review process. We are committed to foster inclusive research and provide a welcoming and inclusive space for everyone, which we hope has been reflected in building our editorial team. Submissions are welcomed from authors of all ethnicities, races, colours, religions, sexes, sexual orientations, gender identities, national origins, disabilities, ages, or other individual status. All authors based at low-income countries will benefit from waiver policies to support article processing charges. Researchers need timely decisions on their submissions. Rejection is part of the “game” of scientific publication. All researchers will have already had (or someday will have) to deal with the dreaded “we regret to inform you…” message that often translates into having to spend some more precious days preparing rejected manuscripts for a new submission elsewhere. High rejection rates, which are currently recorded in several selective publications, are also promoting an unnecessary burden to peer-reviewers, as rejected papers need to undergo a completely new review process, duplicating effort. Overall, rejection of a submitted manuscript results in weeks to months of delay from first submission to publication and, unfortunately, it may often have nothing to do with the scientific soundness of the work being rejected. Wiley has the largest number of Fisheries journals of any publisher, with a portfolio that spans a broad scope of research areas. However, in 2020, 3269 manuscripts were rejected from Wiley Fisheries publications. Nearly 20% of these rejections (705 manuscripts) ended up being published elsewhere, in both Wiley and non-Wiley publications. To improve the author experience and reduce time spent on resubmissions, Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries will work closely with other Fisheries journals in the Wiley portfolio. At the supporter journal's discretion, authors will be given the chance to transfer their original submission and, if applicable, any review reports from the journal of their original submission to Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries. This simple procedure will allow authors to receive a much faster decision on the publication of their manuscript and reduce author effort in preparing resubmissions, whilst still maintaining the integrity of the peer review process and making a more efficient use of reviewer feedback. To further improve this service, article preparation and submission are made as easy as possible for authors, with guidelines being short and simple. At submission or transfer, Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries will only safeguard that a few elements are featured in the article structure, along with some key information from the authors. This means that the transfer can happen quickly and effectively, with little additional formatting required. Changing is never easy. Most of the time people resist change, namely if they are comfortable with the status quo and believe that change has little upside for them. At Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries we pursue change and are motivated to listen to our community and continue to improve our processes. To do so, we are committed to providing an open communication channel. Please feel free to email us with any suggestions or feedback! We aim to mentor a new generation of researchers in the interdisciplinary field that are sustainable fisheries and aquaculture, fostering the full value of renewable aquatic living resources. The world desperately needs a Blue Revolution framed within a circular bioeconomy that can safeguard global food security and the integrity of aquatic ecosystems and its living resources. To pursue this ambitious goal, all sound science produced worldwide must be made freely available to all, if one wants to feed the world in a sustainable way. We think that Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries can contribute to this goal and we welcome all those engaged with the Blue Revolution to join us on this journey.